18F-FES

Molecular imaging to identify patients with metastatic breast cancer who benefit from endocrine treatment combined with cyclin-dependent kinase inhibition

Jorianne Boers, Clasina M. Venema, Erik F.J. de Vries, Andor W.J.M. Glaudemans, Thomas C. Kwee, Ed Schuuring, John W.M. Martens, Sjoerd G. Elias Geke A.P. Hospers, Carolina P. Schröder

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential of 16α-18F-fluoro-17β estradiol (18F-FES) PET to predict prognosis in patients with endometrial cancer (EC).

Background

Adding cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor to endocrine treatment improves outcome in œstrogen receptor (ER) positive metastatic breast cancer, but identifying the subset of patients who benefit is challenging. Response is potentially associated with ER expression heterogeneity. This is because, unlike the primary tumour in the breast that is localized to the organ, the metastatic breast cancer has spread and continues to spread to distant locations in the body such as bones, lungs, liver, axial skeleton, even to the central nervous system like the brain, wherefrom obtaining biopsies are not easy, and also, the metastasised tissues are heterogeneous. Positron emission tomography (PET) with 16a-[18F]fluoro- 17b œstradiol (FES), briefly referred to as FES-PET, allows whole-body ER assessment. We explored whether FES-PET heterogeneity and FES uptake were related to letrozole and palbociclib outcome, in patients with ER positive, metastatic breast cancer.

Patients and methods

Patients underwent a baseline FES-PET and 18F fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET, the FDG-PET served to help identify active sites of breast cancer with contrastenhanced computed tomography (CT). FES-PET heterogeneity score (% FES positive lesions divided by all lesions on FDG-PET and/or CT) and FES uptake were related to outcome and 8-week FDG-PET response. Circulating tumour DNA (CtDNA) samples for ESR1 mutation analysis were collected at baseline.

Results

In 30 patients with 864 metastatic lesions, baseline FES-PET heterogeneity was assessed. In 27 patients with 688 lesions, response was evaluated. Median time to progression (TTP) was 73 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI] 21 to N) in 7 patients with 100% FES positive disease, 27 weeks (14e49) in heterogeneous FES positive disease (20 patients), and 15 weeks (9 to N) without FES positivity (three patients; log-rank P Z 0.30). Geometric mean FES uptake was 2.3 for metabolic progressive patients, 2.5 (Pvs progression Z 0.82) for metabolic stable disease, and 3.3 (Pvs progression Z 0.40) for metabolic response (Ptrend Z 0.21). ESR1 mutations, found in 13/23 patients, were unrelated to FES uptake.

Conclusions

This exploratory study suggests that FES-PET heterogeneity may potentially identify the subset of ER positive, metastatic breast cancer patients who benefit from letrozole combined with CDK inhibition.

To read the whole publication, please contact us.